How LA fires devastation will change the Grammys this year
Published 2 February 2025
The week leading up to the Grammy Awards is typically a star-studded seven days.
It is filled with exclusive parties that draw some of music's top talents from across the globe - producers, singers, agents and musicians - all to the epicentre of the entertainment industry in Los Angeles.
But nearly all of that is non-existent this year. Even the hallmark rowdy after-parties have been cancelled.
There were questions over whether the Grammys ceremony, the "Oscars for Music," would even go on as planned on Sunday after Los Angeles saw its most devastating fire disaster ever recorded - blazes that were only fully doused on Friday after burning for 24 days.
Twenty-nine people have died and more than 16,000 homes and businesses have been destroyed - with whole neighbourhoods now ash. Many artists and industry professionals are among those who lost homes, studios and equipment.
In the muted lead-up to the show, efforts usually put toward parties have gone instead toward fundraising efforts. Showrunners say the ceremony itself will also look different.
To cancel the show or not?
The Recording Academy, which runs the show, said the show is needed more than ever. Trustees say the evening will double as a charitable event to raise money and honour both the victims and the emergency responders who risked their lives.
But it will look different than years past.
Showrunners are looking to strike the right tone honouring the victims of the fire and displaying a defiant Los Angeles that will persevere. But there is concern the optics of rich celebrities dolled up with smiles on a red carpet could come off as tone deaf.
Recording Academy CEO Harvey Mason Jr. said that the show include a reimagined format, scaled-back red carpet and a more reflective tone.
He highlighted the economic impact, noting that thousands rely on Grammy-related work, particularly in the service industry. He framed the event as a symbol of resilience, arguing that cancelling would not benefit the city or music industry.
"Cancelling, pushing, moving does not accomplish what us standing together" does, Mr Mason argued in a webcast. The show will be "unifying and coming together, honouring music, but also using the power of music to heal, rebuild and provide services to people who need it".
"I think this might be one of the most important Grammy weeks we've ever had."
Mr Mason told the New York Times that they consulted a range of public officials about whether they should hold the event - including the city's mayor and California Governor Gavin Newsom - and whether it would hinder fire response efforts.
"They strongly suggested that we continue forward with hosting the event," he told the outlet. "Everyone said there's nothing good that comes from postponing."
But there are still worries that the night will be a bad look for the music industry.
"I actually don't think that the Grammys should be happening," Elyn Kazarian, a creative director in the music industry, told the BBC.
"It's just very weird to me that there are going to be celebrities on a red carpet wearing expensive clothes while people in other parts of the city are suffering and whose livelihoods have been destroyed."